In recent years, the balancing act between ensuring national security and safeguarding personal privacy has tipped alarmingly toward state overreach. This trend is akin to the slow, creeping fog banks of Newfoundland “roll in” that I observed with a mix of curiosity and apprehension as a boy. Just as those fogs transformed clear, sunny days into cold, obscured ones, Bill C-2—the proposed Strong Borders Act—threatens to envelop our freedoms in a chilling mist of surveillance and control.

Initially, fog seems benign. It starts as a distant, grey haze that one might assume will have little impact on the sunny warmth of the day. In much the same way, government proposals, ostensibly designed to protect us, often seem innocuous. Bill C-2 is no exception. It is touted as a critical measure for enhancing border security and combating organized crime. Yet, beneath this benign facade lies a dangerous encroachment on civil liberties, positioning the government as an intrusive overseer—a “Big Brother.”
As the fog creeps over the ocean’s surface, it eventually crashes against the shore with a relentless, quiet determination. Similarly, the provisions buried within Bill C-2 gradually encroach upon and erode privacy rights. The bill introduces “information demand” powers, allowing law enforcement to access Internet subscriber information without a warrant. This is justified under the guise of safety but conveniently sidesteps judicial scrutiny, thereby treating our privacy as expendable.
The creeping fog seeps into every nook and cranny, chilling everything in its path. With Bill C-2, the government’s reach extends deeply into our lives by permitting surveillance based on mere suspicion. It enables data collection on a broad array of activities, encompassing any offense under any Act of Parliament. This overreach becomes a chilling mist that numbs our rights, much like the fog that chills the air and obscures vision.
Moreover, the analogy of fog perfectly illustrates the deceptive allure of governmental promises. The fog gradually claims the landscape, as do bills that erode liberties behind the illusion of safety. Once the fog arrives, clarity and warmth are replaced by damp obscurity. Likewise, when a government captures the power to sift through personal data without oversight, the clarity of open society and the warmth of liberty are supplanted by a cold regime of surveillance.
In Newfoundland, when the fog thickens, visibility shrinks. You no longer see the path ahead. I remember walking as if in a cloud unable to see where I was going. Under Bill C-2, the fog of governmental overreach obstructs the transparency that is essential in a democracy. Accountability and open debate become obscured in the mist of bureaucratic mandates, denying citizens the ability to foresee the implications of such legislation.
The government assures us these measures are vital for national security. However, the history of creeping governmental authority tells us that unchecked power can obscure freedoms and lead to an environment ripe for abuse. Once lost, regaining freedom is far more challenging than preserving it. Just as navigating through thick Newfoundland fog becomes an exercise in caution and patience, navigating through a society where privacy is compromised demands vigilance and resilience against authoritarian drift.
As citizens, it is our duty to ensure that the state does not encroach upon our liberties under the pretense of safety. We must advocate for the kind of oversight and due process that wards against overreach. Each encroaching tendril of unchecked governmental power should be resisted—not just when it is overt, but even when it seems benign at first. We must ask whether the reach for more power and surveillance is truly necessary. Notice, when governments get more power, they rarely give it up when the “crisis” is over.
In my view, Bill C-2 represents more than just a set of safety measures; it is a foreboding fog bank encroaching on the shores of our freedoms. Just as one would seek shelter from a Newfoundland fog to stay warm and dry, we must remain vigilant, questioning, and active to safeguard our freedoms against the creeping fog of state overreach. We must demand more accountability of our government. Only by doing so can we ensure that the sun of liberty continues to shine brightly on our democratic society, unfettered by the blinding mist of control.